USE EXAMPLES OF THE NETWORKS OF ONTOLOGY FOR EUROPEAN POETRY
Use examples
In order to facilitate the understanding of the some classes and properties of this vocabulary, some examples are provided below.
It should be noted that the instances will be represented by their URIs (Uniform Resource Identifier) created according to the following structure <https://postdata.linhd.uned.es/resource/{Class}/{UUID}>.
For example, the Person1 is identified by <https://postdata.linhd.uned.es/resource/Person/ccc591fe0-7f10-11e9-ac29-f2189886299d>
Example 1. Authorship
The example presented corresponds to the representation of the authorship part of the cantiga “Pedr’ Amigo, quer’ ora ũa ren’ by Johan Baveca & Pedr’ Friend of Sevilha”, whose information is extracted from MedDB Lírica Profana Galego-Portuguesa database. Nettle Number 064022
Example description
The troubadours Johan Baveca & Pedr’ Friend of Sevilha are the creators (pdcore:CreatorRole) of the cantiga that is modeled as a PoeticWork and its title is(PoeticWork1.title = “Pedr’ Amigo, quer’ ora ũa ren”).
However, this type of composition was, allegedly, an improvisation similar to the freestyle battles in rap. This means that also each Stanza needs to be linked to the correspondent CreatorRole.
This question is modelled in such a way that the CretorRole of the Cantiga pdcore:correspondsTo two persons:
- Person1.name = “Johan Baveca”
- Person2.name = “Pedr’ Amigo de Sevilha”
The text presented is the Redaction: • PoeticWork1 – isRealisedThrough – Redaction1
In regards to the editions, multiple references are cited. The most important one is the so-called “Seguida” (followed) which would be represented as:
- Redaction1 — retrievesTextLocation1
The representation of the example is shown in the image below
In the next block of RDF code the modeling of multiple authorship is shown first.
The complete code of the example is shown below.
It should be noted that this code shows the relationship of PoeticWork with CreatorRole
On the other hand the relationship with its Redaction through pdcore:isRealisedThrough.
Example 2. Redactions
The example presented the manifestations of “Jámbor házasok, meghallgassátok – Házasének” poetic work through the description of its redactions , whose information is extracted from Répertoire de la poésie hongroise ancienne
Example description
In this case, there doesn’t seem to be a title to identify the work but a number. Then we have information about the themes:
- PoeticWork.theme = “Jámbor házasok”
- PoeticWork.theme = “meghallgassátok”
The creator seems to be anonymous:
The following redaction has a score composer role associated, modeled through Role class and it is performed by a Person
- Redaction1 – Role1.roleName=score composer – Person1.name=Batizi András
For this work we have, on one side the “synthetic” version and on the right side the multiple “analytic” versions.
Although the text is not present, there are results based on a version of a text, so the concept of Redaction does exist.
For instance, there is a metrical pattern whose description would be made in an instance of WorkPattern although this corresponds to postdata-prosodicElements (pdprosodic) ontology.
- Redaction1 — isAnalysedThrough — WorkPattern1
The relation between the synthetic version and each one of the eighteen analytic versions is:
- Redaction1 —isSynthesisOf — Redaction[2-19].
Each one of those eighteen versions corresponds to a Witness but this is pertinent for a transmission ontology.
The representation of the example is shown in the image below
The complete code of the example is shown below.
It should be noted that this code shows the relationship of PoeticWork with CreatorRole
On the other hand the relationship with its Redaction through pdcore:isRealisedThrough.
The Redaction relations, like hasAgent with a Role, isSynthesisOf with an another Redaction and isAnalysesThrough with a WorkPattern, is also represented.